NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 275.71 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 732 vs 654
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops vs 275.71 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 732 vs 654 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1436 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11217 vs 1817
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2261
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2261
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1436 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt vs 41 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11217 vs 1817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2261 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2261 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 732 | 654 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1817 | 11217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.367 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 118.389 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.396 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.921 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.393 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1745 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2261 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1745 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2261 | 3329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 7 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1372 | 1375 |
| Price now | $78.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.66 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 876 MHz | 1436 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | 275.71 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 38 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 727 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 360M
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6630M
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
