NVIDIA Quadro K620M versus AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD Radeon HD 6570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 624.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 40 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 versus 551
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 versus 1564
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 versus 4.278
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 versus 59.183
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2015 versus 7 February 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 624.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 versus 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 versus 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 versus 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 versus 59.183 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 158
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 versus 165.904
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 versus 927
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 versus 1349
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 versus 927
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 versus 1349
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 versus 165.904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 versus 1291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 versus 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 versus 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 versus 1291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 versus 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 versus 1349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 551 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 | 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 2716 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GM108 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2015 | 7 February 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1429 | 1432 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 650 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |