NVIDIA Quadro K620M versus NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA NVS 510 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 41% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 versus 692
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 versus 1708
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 versus 6.809
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 165.904 versus 111.269
- 9.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 versus 9.522
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 versus 1211
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 versus 1211
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2015 versus 23 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 versus 692 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 versus 1708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 versus 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 versus 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 versus 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 versus 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 versus 1211 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 510
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 versus 158
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 versus 927
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 versus 1349
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 versus 927
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 versus 1349
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 versus 158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 versus 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 versus 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 versus 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 versus 1349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 692 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 | 1708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 1720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2015 | 23 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1429 | 1430 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 797 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |