NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 365 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 30.921
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.204 vs 107.239
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3330
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 24 March 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 vs 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 vs 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1093 MHz
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 3216
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 315
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 vs 10582
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 793.297
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 3.631
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2645
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2645
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1093 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,399 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 3216 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 315 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 vs 10582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 vs 793.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 vs 3.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 vs 48.966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 2645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 2645 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3216 | 3341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 12811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 3.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GF110 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 24 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 776 | 779 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $184 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 365 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1707 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |