NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro S7150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4284 vs 3770
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 6147
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 6147
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 583
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 583
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 1 February 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 vs 3770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 vs 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 vs 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 583 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1025 MHz
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 380
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27128 vs 16429
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3715
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3715
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1025 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 2,099 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27128 vs 16429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | AMD FirePro S7150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 414 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 | 3770 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | 27128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Tonga |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 1 February 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 640 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | 3,763 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |