NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 65.6 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 5269
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 5269
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2344
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2344

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 27 September 2016
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 896
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337 vs 5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337 vs 5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 2344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 2344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1025 MHz
Around 2% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz

Core clock speed	1090 MHz vs 1025 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

5269

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

5269

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2344

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3357

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
PassMark - G2D Mark	380
PassMark - G3D Mark	4284
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337	5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337	5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	2344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	2344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		44.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		785.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		65.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		196.307

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Code name	GM206	Baffin
Launch date	11 January 2017	27 September 2016
Place in performance rating	473	796
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	1090 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	1024	896
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	57.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	3,000 million
Boost clock speed		1200 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	112.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5