NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3654
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3654

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 15 August 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1025 MHz
2x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
2x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 380
Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 4284
Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 vs 16429
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 6337
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 6337

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1025 MHz
Texture fill rate	133.6 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	4,275 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 380
PassMark - G3D Mark	8160 vs 4284
Geekbench - OpenCL	31098 vs 16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12645 vs 6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12645 vs 6337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

380

444

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4284

8160

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16429

31098

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

12645

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

12645

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3654

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3654

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3359

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark	380	444
PassMark - G3D Mark	4284	8160
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429	31098
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337	12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337	12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		509.222
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3677

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Code name	GM206	GP106B
Launch date	11 January 2017	15 August 2016
Place in performance rating	473	385
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$237.11
Price now		$229.99
Value for money (0-100)		49.49
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	1506 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	4,275 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Pipelines	1024	1280
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	133.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	4,400 million
Boost clock speed		1708 MHz
CUDA cores		1280
Maximum GPU temperature		94 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	192 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
Surround
Virtual Reality
VR Ready