NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 796 MHz
Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 65.6 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
Around 16% better floating-point performance: 2,099 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4284 vs 4000
Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16429 vs 14591
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 5523
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 5523
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3325
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3325

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed	1025 MHz vs 796 MHz
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4284 vs 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429 vs 14591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 380

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	565 vs 380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

380

565

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4284

4000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16429

14591

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3325

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G2D Mark	380	565
PassMark - G3D Mark	4284	4000
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429	14591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		225.868

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM206	GM206
Launch date	11 January 2017	8 April 2016
Place in performance rating	473	572
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$437.75
Price now		$409.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.23
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	796 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	768
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	2,940 million
Boost clock speed		1163 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		201 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management