NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 667 MHz
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6099 vs 4566

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

• Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1363 vs 1171
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 181
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 2174
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 2174
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 1729
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 1729
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3122
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1171 1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	181 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6099 4566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2174 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2174 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3362

Compare specifications (specs)