NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1041 MHz vs 667 MHz
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt

Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 19 July 2014
Core clock speed	1041 MHz vs 667 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 26.68 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 853.8 gflops vs 799.5 gflops
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 vs 226
Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3501 vs 1899
Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10787 vs 6270
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4750 vs 3079
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4750 vs 3079
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1692
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1692
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3084 vs 3011
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3084 vs 3011

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	26.68 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops vs 799.5 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	367 vs 226
PassMark - G3D Mark	3501 vs 1899
Geekbench - OpenCL	10787 vs 6270
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4750 vs 3079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4750 vs 3079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 1692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 1692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3084 vs 3011
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3084 vs 3011

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

226

367

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1899

3501

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6270

10787

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3079

4750

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3079

4750

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1692

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1692

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3011

3084

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3011

3084

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
PassMark - G2D Mark	226	367
PassMark - G3D Mark	1899	3501
Geekbench - OpenCL	6270	10787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3079	4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3079	4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1692	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1692	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3011	3084
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3011	3084

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM108	GM107
Launch date	11 January 2017	19 July 2014
Place in performance rating	950	549
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1041 MHz	667 MHz
Floating-point performance	799.5 gflops	853.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	640
Texture fill rate	16.66 GTexel / s	26.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus