NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11883 vs 9580
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 8673
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 8673
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 March 2016 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11883 vs 9580 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 8673 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 8,602 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 691
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3715
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 vs 691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11883 | 9580 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 691 | 799 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40181 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM200 | Fiji |
Launch date | 5 March 2016 | 24 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | $649 |
Place in performance rating | 239 | 236 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 8,602 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 191 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |