NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
  • 6.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11883 vs 9580
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 8673
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 8673
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 March 2016 vs 24 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1114 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate 285.2 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11883 vs 9580
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13107 vs 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13107 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
  • Around 26% better floating-point performance: 8,602 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 691
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3715
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3715
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 4096 vs 3072
Floating-point performance 8,602 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 799 vs 691
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8925 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8925 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11883
9580
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
691
799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13107
8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13107
8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
8925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3361
Name NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark 11883 9580
PassMark - G2D Mark 691 799
Geekbench - OpenCL 40181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13107 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13107 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3361
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 857.575
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5170

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name GM200 Fiji
Launch date 5 March 2016 24 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $4,999 $649
Place in performance rating 239 236
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1114 MHz 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 988 MHz
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops 8,602 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 3072 4096
Texture fill rate 285.2 GTexel / s 268.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 8,000 million 8,900 million
Compute units 64
Stream Processors 4096

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 191 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 317.4 GB / s 512 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz 1050 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)