NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 460 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 4.32 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 38 Watt
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 7 May 2009 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 29.44 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 248 vs 111
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 43
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 858 vs 494
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 858 vs 494
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 29.44 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 vs 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 858 vs 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 858 vs 494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 111 | 248 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 494 | 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 494 | 858 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G84 |
Launch date | 7 May 2009 | 12 September 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $54.50 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1676 | 1619 |
Price now | $49.75 | $89.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.51 | 1.66 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 460 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 3.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.12 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |