NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 713 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1086 MHz
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 5579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1565
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 5579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 18 November 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 713 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1086 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 1565 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1792 vs 512
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5489 vs 4500
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 590
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25596 vs 15667
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 vs 71.86
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1362.14 vs 832.248
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.025 vs 4.039
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 65.117
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 250.267 vs 245.081
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5489 vs 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 vs 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 vs 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 vs 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 vs 245.081 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 5489 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 25596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 87.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1362.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 6.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 106.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 250.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 1565 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 18 November 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 517 | 477 |
Price now | $319.99 | $349.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | 19.34 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 713 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 121.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |