NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1188 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1243 MHz
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 3575
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 3575

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

• 3x more texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 4.5x more pipelines: 2304 vs 512
• 3x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7811 vs 4500
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 590
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39388 vs 15667
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.834 vs 71.86
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 832.248
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.152 vs 4.039
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 65.117
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.677 vs 245.081
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10320 vs 6796
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10320 vs 6796

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 7811
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 797
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 39388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 115.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 1987.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 10.152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 105.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 597.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3347

Compare specifications (specs)