NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon R9 370X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P1000

AMD Radeon R9 370X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 980 MHz
Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1030 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 180 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 65.071

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 February 2017 vs 27 August 2015
Core clock speed	1266 MHz vs 980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt vs 180 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	71.86 vs 65.071

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X

Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 832.248
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.039
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 65.117
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 245.081
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 6796
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 6796

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	82.4 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,637 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1139.703 vs 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.39 vs 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	88.44 vs 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	337.583 vs 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8393 vs 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3704 vs 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8393 vs 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3704 vs 3702

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.86

65.071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

832.248

1139.703

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.039

5.39

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

65.117

88.44

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

245.081

337.583

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6796

8393

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3702

3704

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6796

8393

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3702

3704

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P1000	AMD Radeon R9 370X
PassMark - G3D Mark	4453
PassMark - G2D Mark	601
Geekbench - OpenCL	15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	71.86	65.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	832.248	1139.703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.039	5.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	65.117	88.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	245.081	337.583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6796	8393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3702	3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3348	3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6796	8393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3702	3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3348	3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1591

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P1000	AMD Radeon R9 370X
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Code name	GP107	Trinidad
Launch date	7 February 2017	27 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$199
Place in performance rating	523	516
Price now	$319.99
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	15.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1030 MHz
Core clock speed	1266 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	2,637 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	1280
Texture fill rate	59.2 GTexel / s	82.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt	180 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	2,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	221 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	179.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5