NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 24.676
• 5.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 4500
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 590
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 15667
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 71.86
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 832.248
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.039
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 245.081
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6796
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6796

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 650
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 305

Compare specifications (specs)