NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 148 Watt
• 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 35.714
• 4.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 369

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

• Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 512
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 4500
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 590
• Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 15667
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 71.86
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 832.248
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 4.039
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 245.081
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 6796
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 6796

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 9640
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 766
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 28498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 490.688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 369

Compare specifications (specs)