NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 2721
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 424
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 6674
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 18.462
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 427.88
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 1.899
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 23.742
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 61.965
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3321
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3321
• Around 95% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 817

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 817

Compare specifications (specs)