NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 31.471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 vs 31.471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 512
- 6.7x better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 4500
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 590
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 15667
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 vs 71.86
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1916.09 vs 832.248
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 4.039
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 545.751 vs 245.081
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 6796
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 6796
- 5.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 1591
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 vs 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 vs 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 vs 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 1591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 15451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 725 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 63932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP107 | GP102 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $5,999 |
Place in performance rating | 517 | 204 |
Price now | $319.99 | $4,403.52 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | 3.90 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 12,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 3840 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |