NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 391

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 512
• 2.9x better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 4500
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37924 vs 15667
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 71.86
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 832.248
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 4.039
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 65.117
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 245.081
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 6796
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 6796

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 9097
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 391
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 37924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 523.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3341

Compare specifications (specs)