NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1201 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 3676
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22896 vs 17696
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 55.077
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 830.773
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.736 vs 4.132
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 225.985
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 1123
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2678
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 1123
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2678

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 630
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 81.206

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 3676
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 634
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 17696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 225.985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 2678

Compare specifications (specs)