NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
• Around 22% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 5918
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 323
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22896 vs 20732
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 75.758
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 843.503
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.736 vs 5.071
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 24.676
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 301.168
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 8496
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 8496
• Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 2340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3316

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 2340

Compare specifications (specs)