NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 876x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 8 GB/s
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 28.289
• 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 1082

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 202.0 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 1920 vs 768
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 6,463 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 vs 6957
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 630
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47476 vs 22896
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 113.416
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1718.593 vs 1414.794
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 6.736
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 417.823
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3316
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3316

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 13504
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 847
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 1082

Compare specifications (specs)