NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 72 billion / sec
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,413 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
• 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 6111
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22896 vs 18734
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 73.733
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 792.44
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.736 vs 4.888
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 35.338
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 200.825
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 7218
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 7218
• 18.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 630
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 3316

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 162

Compare specifications (specs)