NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• 1786.9x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 6332
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 650
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 20732
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 75.758
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 843.503
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 5.071
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 24.676
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 301.168
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
• 11.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1676
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 650
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 305

Compare specifications (specs)