NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 893.7x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12021 vs 11437
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3717
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 1676
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12021 vs 11437
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3717
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 1676
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 5 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 1676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31469 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 5034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 5034 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP106 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 304 | 276 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4400 million | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
