NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 893.7x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12021 vs 11437
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3717
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 1676
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12021 vs 11437
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3717
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 1676
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 1676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9355 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32458 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 5034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 5034 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP106 | GP106 |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 312 | 288 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 4400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |