NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 133.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 80 Watt
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 15 August 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 80 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1404 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 5 GB
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12021 versus 11437
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 versus 3717
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 versus 1676
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12021 versus 11437
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 versus 3717
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 versus 1676
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1404 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 5 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 versus 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9339 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32446 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 5034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 5034 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 319 | 284 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 4,400 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 5 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P2200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
