NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 2655.7x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 3572
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 548
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 12020
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 40.695
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 588.094
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 3.205
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 30.455
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 166.26
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 4921
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1577
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 4921
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1577
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 1193

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 548
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 1193

Compare specifications (specs)