NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 5 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 versus 3572
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 versus 548
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 versus 12020
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 versus 40.695
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 versus 588.094
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 versus 3.205
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 30.455
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 versus 166.26
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 versus 4921
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1577
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 versus 4921
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1577
- 2.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 versus 1193
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 22 July 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 640 |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 5 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 versus 3572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 versus 548 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 versus 12020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 versus 40.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 versus 588.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 versus 3.205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 30.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 versus 166.26 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 versus 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 versus 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 versus 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 versus 1671 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 versus 1193 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 68 Watt versus 75 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 3572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 548 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 12020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 40.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 588.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 3.205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 30.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 166.26 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 1671 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 1193 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GP106 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 22 July 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 307 | 787 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
Prix maintenant | $343.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1046 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 68 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 202 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz |