NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 771 MHz
• Around 90% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 784 MHz
• 1359.8x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 4340
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 498
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 12321
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 33.016
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 736.063
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 2.73
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 31.588
• 7.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 70.194
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 6373
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3382
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 6373
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3382

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

• Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1676
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 4340
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 498
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 12321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3311

Compare specifications (specs)