NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P2200

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 773 MHz
1485.3x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 6680
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 673
Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 18372
Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 65.548
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 732.046
Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 5.453
6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 17.725
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 217.357
Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 6291
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3685
Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 6291
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3685
5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 680

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 June 2019 vs 29 June 2015
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 773 MHz
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9372 vs 6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	892 vs 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	32343 vs 18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124 vs 65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592 vs 732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.452 vs 5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742 vs 17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	510.941 vs 217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437 vs 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437 vs 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3685
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3404 vs 680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Around 30% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1280
Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 1676
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 1676

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1664 vs 1280
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9372

6680

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

892

673

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32343

18372

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.124

65.548

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1958.592

732.046

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.452

5.453

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.742

17.725

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

510.941

217.357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

6291

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3332

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

6291

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3332

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3404

680

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	NVIDIA Quadro M4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	9372	6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	892	673
Geekbench - OpenCL	32343	18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124	65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592	732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.452	5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742	17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	510.941	217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437	6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1676	3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437	6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1676	3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3404	680

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GP106	GM204
Launch date	10 June 2019	29 June 2015
Place in performance rating	307	534
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$791
Price now		$765.93
Value for money (0-100)		10.68
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	773 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	119.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	59.72 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.822 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	1664
Pixel fill rate	59.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s	80.39 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	4400 million	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		2,573 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm (7.9")	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
SLI options		1
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	160 bit	256 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		6008 MHz
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management