NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 1260.6x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 6957
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 630
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 22896
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 113.416
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1414.794
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 6.736
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 81.206
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 417.823
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3681
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3681
• Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 2958

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 1676
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 6957
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 2958

Compare specifications (specs)