NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 94.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 768
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 versus 6957
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 versus 630
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 versus 22896
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 versus 113.416
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 versus 1414.794
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 versus 6.736
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 81.206
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 versus 417.823
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 versus 10251
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3681
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 versus 10251
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3681
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 versus 2958
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 6 February 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 768 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 versus 6957 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 versus 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 versus 22896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 versus 113.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 versus 1414.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 versus 6.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 81.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 versus 417.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 versus 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 versus 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3681 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 versus 2958 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1076 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 versus 1676
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 versus 1676
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1076 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 versus 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 6957 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 22896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 113.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 1414.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 6.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 81.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 417.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3316 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 2958 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 307 | 387 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $585 | |
| Prix maintenant | $429.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1076 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 4,400 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,031 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 201 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 5 GB | 5 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
