NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 810 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
• 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
• 4.4x better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1024 MB
• 4012x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 322
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 131
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3053 vs 1283
• 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 2.471
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 309.824 vs 77.99
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.38 vs 0.233
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 6.018
• 20.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 4.053
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 555
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 835
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 1155
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 555
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 835
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 1155
• 7.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 vs 87

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 30 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 322
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 131
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 1283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 2.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 77.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 0.233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 6.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 4.053
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 835
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 835
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 1155
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 87

Compare specifications (specs)