NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
• Around 42% better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 62 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 947
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 303
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 10.229
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 309.824 vs 258.26
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.38 vs 0.885
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 13.688
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 19.02
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1600
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1682
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 2668
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1600
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1682
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 3053

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 2668

Compare specifications (specs)