NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 475 MHz
• Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• Around 40% better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 142 Watt
• Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 2808 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 1476
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 382
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 13.345
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 309.824 vs 306.122
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 20.453
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 39.651
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 2079
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 2079

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5013 vs 3053
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.552 vs 1.38
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 2875
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3328
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 2875
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3328

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 1476
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3350

Compare specifications (specs)