NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 256 vs 32
- 9.4x better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 72 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 9.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 174
- 10.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 41
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 1687
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 1687
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 vs 174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 vs 41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 1687 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | 174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 41 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 1687 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP107 | G96C |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 9 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 983 | 1585 |
Price now | $119.99 | $59.46 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | 5.88 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |