NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 810 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 424
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 18.462
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 23.742
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 61.965

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
• Around 83% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2721 vs 1651
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6674 vs 3053
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 427.88 vs 309.824
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.899 vs 1.38
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2709
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2875
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2709
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2875
• Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 817 vs 617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 817

Compare specifications (specs)