NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro K420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
- 2x better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 2048x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 733
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 288
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3053 vs 1843
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 6
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 309.824 vs 186.605
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.38 vs 0.433
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 10.365
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 17.75
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1245
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 598
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 1241
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1245
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 598
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 1241
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 22 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops vs 336.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 vs 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 vs 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 vs 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 vs 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 vs 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 vs 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 vs 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 vs 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 1241 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 1241 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | $96.67 |
Place in performance rating | 983 | 1467 |
Price now | $119.99 | $89.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | 10.27 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 876 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 160 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB / 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |