NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1252 MHz
• 4.5x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
• 4.5x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 1651
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 435
• 7.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22896 vs 3053
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 19.856
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 309.824
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.736 vs 1.38
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 25.011
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 84.489
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 2709
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2875
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 2709
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2875
• 4.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 6957
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 2958

Compare specifications (specs)