NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P520

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 954 MHz
782.5x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2091 vs 1578
Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7960 vs 4071
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2446
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2446
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 1631
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 1631
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2295 vs 1974
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2295 vs 1974

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 1 March 2013
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 954 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2091 vs 1578
Geekbench - OpenCL	7960 vs 4071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295 vs 1974

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

35.3x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 1800 million
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 237

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	385 vs 237

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

237

385

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2091

1578

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7960

4071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

2446

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

2446

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

1631

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

1631

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

1974

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

1974

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G2D Mark	237	385
PassMark - G3D Mark	2091	1578
Geekbench - OpenCL	7960	4071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	1974
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		38.219
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP108	GK107
Launch date	27 May 2019	1 March 2013
Place in performance rating	758	1206
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$164.99
Value for money (0-100)		11.74
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	384
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	51 Watt
Floating-point performance		732.7 gflops
Transistor count		1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		202 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor