NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 23.89 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 30x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 1800 million
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 237
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 2091
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 7960
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 3527
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 3527
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3566
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3566
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2295
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2295
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 23.89 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 1800 million |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 237 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7235 vs 2091 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 7960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 3527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 3527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 430 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2091 | 7235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7960 | 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Code name | GP108 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 758 | 362 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P520 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAT600
