NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 500 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 8681
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2016 vs 29 April 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 500 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 8681 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 3840
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 725
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 3840 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 vs 725 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | 8681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 752 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP102 | Vesuvius |
| Launch date | 1 October 2016 | 29 April 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 204 | 203 |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | $1,099.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | 11.14 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | 2x 5,733 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 2816 |
| Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 6,200 million |
| Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 307 mm |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 640 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||