NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- Around 85% better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 11919
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 717
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 40028
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 13107
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 13107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 11919 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 717 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 40028 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | 11919 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 717 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 | 40028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | GM200 |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 244 |
Price now | $4,403.52 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |