NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1250 MHz
  • 657.1x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 210 Watt
  • 8.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63810 vs 61755
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 12822
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 12822
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 14 August 2017
Boost clock speed 1380 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 210 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 63810 vs 61755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 vs 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 vs 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 499
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 11023
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1138 MHz vs 945 MHz
Pipelines 3584 vs 2304
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 828 vs 499
PassMark - G3D Mark 12354 vs 11023

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
499
828
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11023
12354
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
63810
61755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3353
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
PassMark - G2D Mark 499 828
PassMark - G3D Mark 11023 12354
Geekbench - OpenCL 63810 61755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 153.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1722.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 126.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1172.788

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name N19E-Q1 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 14 August 2017
Place in performance rating 244 241
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1250 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1138 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 3584
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 302.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 210 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 12,500 million
Floating-point performance 9,677 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 402.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 1572 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready