NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

2.7x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 215 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 215 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 522
Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 11163
Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 vs 64529
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 14496
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 14496

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed	1605 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Pipelines	2560 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	885 vs 522
PassMark - G3D Mark	18252 vs 11163
Geekbench - OpenCL	99847 vs 64529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25232 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25232 vs 14496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

522

885

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11163

18252

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64529

99847

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

25232

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

25232

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3359

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark	522	885
PassMark - G3D Mark	11163	18252
Geekbench - OpenCL	64529	99847
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1438.826
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		7

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Code name	N19E-Q1	TU104
Launch date	27 May 2019	2 July 2019
Place in performance rating	231	133
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$499
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1770 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	2560
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	13.6 B
CUDA cores		2560
Maximum GPU temperature		88 C
Render output units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Display Port		1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	6 pin + 8 pin
Height		4.556” (115.7mm)
Length		10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		650 Watt
Width		2-Slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready
Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI