NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 51% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 625 MHz
9935x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
12x more pipelines: 2304 vs 192
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
5.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 303
11.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 947
16.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 3879
9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 1600
9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 1600
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 1682
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 1682
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2668
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2668

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 24 December 2010
Core clock speed	945 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	498 vs 303
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967 vs 947
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532 vs 3879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 80 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	62 Watt vs 80 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

303

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10967

947

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

63532

3879

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

1600

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

1600

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

1682

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

1682

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

2668

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

2668

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro 2000
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	303
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967	947
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532	3879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	1682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	2668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	2668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		19.02

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Fermi
Code name	N19E-Q1	GF106
Launch date	27 May 2019	24 December 2010
Place in performance rating	249	1287
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$87.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.65
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	625 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	192
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	62 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	1,170 million
Floating-point performance		480.0 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		178 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready