NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2097.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 6957
2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 22896
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 10251
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 10251
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3316
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3316

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 6 February 2017
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 5 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967 vs 6957
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532 vs 22896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 498

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1076 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	630 vs 498

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

630

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10967

6957

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

63532

22896

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3316

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	630
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967	6957
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532	22896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		417.823
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2958

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	N19E-Q1	GP106
Launch date	27 May 2019	6 February 2017
Place in performance rating	249	387
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$585
Price now		$429.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.44
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1480 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	768
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,031 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		201 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready