NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1446.1x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11163 vs 10579
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64529 vs 34875
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 103
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 vs 10579 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64529 vs 34875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1227 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 525 vs 522
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 14496
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1227 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 vs 522 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 525 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | 10579 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64529 | 34875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 103 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 285 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
