NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 498
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 10967
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 63532
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 14496
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 498 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 vs 10967 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 63532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 | 15652 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 | 105171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 249 | 138 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
IntelArc Pro A50
